War Board

On Fri Apr 03 01:09:46 2009, Chaitan wrote: > On Thu Apr 02 14:02:43 2009, Wildcat wrote: > > On Wed Apr 01 23:21:21 2009, Tigger wrote: > > > On Mon Mar 30 11:14:42 2009, Tigger wrote: > > > > On Sun Mar 22 13:50:39 2009, Wildcat wrote: > > > > > Provide feedback on the # of teams in wars now please > > > > > > > > > The last few wars I've been in have seemed to work out just finr as > > far > > > as > > > > number of teams and balance of teams. > > > > > > > I spoke too soon. We just had a war with 5 teams, each of them only > one > > > hero (one player per team for that matter) with a range from +5 to +1. > > > > Might need a little tweaking. > > > > > I'll admit prime numbers is a weakness of the system, but with 5 heroes > > what would you have done? Isn't 3-2 a huge advantage for the 3? > > > Yes, 2-2-1 is much better than 3-2. I dare predict that most often that > joker player will choose to help the weaker side or he's most likely > screwed. > In this case, 2-2-1 would have been better since the next closest to the +5 was +3. Would have been an even war with a +3 and +1 on each team vs the solo +5. Even without the level discrepency, though, I'd prefer 3 teams over an "ind" team war.